Your message dated 05 Feb 2002 11:25:27 +0000
with message-id <1012908327.31749.58.camel@mill>
and subject line
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jan 2002 23:20:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 02 17:20:25 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from eisberg.sourcepole.ch (eisberg) [194.6.185.253]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16LugK-0006Hk-00; Wed, 02 Jan 2002 17:20:25 -0600
Received: from tpo by eisberg with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
id 16LugD-0006al-00; Thu, 03 Jan 2002 00:20:17 +0100
From: Tomas Pospisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: boot-floppies: please, please, please include a pointer to basedebs/disks
somewhere
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.36
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.36
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 00:20:17 +0100
Message-Id: <E16LugD-0006al-00@eisberg>
Sender: Tomas Pospisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: boot-floppies
Version: 3.0.18-2001-12-21
Severity: normal
AFAIK there is nowhere a mention where one can find the basedebs.tgz or
the base-disks. Please, please, please spare the volounteers that go and
try to install testing what in heaven could have gone wrong, where possibly
one could find the base-stuff and then installing some possibly stale old
basedebs.tgz that s/he found on some obscure internet site and that possibly
will break together with the newer install disks.
Mind you there is *nowhere* AFAIS a mention of any base-stuff at all allthough
it is required depending on how you install the system.
*t
PS: I'm taging this as a "normal" bug since this effectively breaks the install
i.e. the user is left at a point at a place where he has no internet access
with a half installed system where he's spend a few hours allready to
install it.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux eisberg 2.2.18 #1 Thu Jan 18 11:10:26 CET 2001 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 127546-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Feb 2002 11:25:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 05 05:25:29 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-62-3-66-203.zen.co.uk (mail.nexus.co.uk) [62.3.66.203]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16Y3j7-0002A2-00; Tue, 05 Feb 2002 05:25:29 -0600
Received: from dsl-62-3-66-201.zen.co.uk ([62.3.66.201] helo=mill.nexus.co.uk)
by mail.nexus.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16Y3iy-0001u7-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 05 Feb 2002 11:25:20 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain)
by mill.nexus.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16Y3j5-0008Qk-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 05 Feb 2002 11:25:27 +0000
Subject:
From: Phil Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.1
Date: 05 Feb 2002 11:25:27 +0000
Message-Id: <1012908327.31749.58.camel@mill>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The basedebs tarball is in the ftp archive now, so I guess this issue is
resolved.
p.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
