On Sat, 2002-02-02 at 09:16, David Kimdon wrote:
> Is the following ioctl what you had in mind pb?  It doesn't make the
> problem go away, unfortunate.  The ioctl always returns -1 for me so
> maybe I'm doing something wrong.

That does sound a bit strange.  It'd be interesting to know what errno
you end up with after the failing ioctl.  The code looks pretty much OK
to me.

Might also be worth turning the swap on hda2 off (or not setting it up
in the first place) just to see if that makes a difference.  It
shouldn't, but you never know.

p.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to