Hi,
Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-04-11 at 17:13 +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > in build/entities/common.ent there was the name of the architecture
> > missing. So what's the exact pronunciation of that arch?
> > (for powerpc we have "PowerPC" for example)
> > Is there some special form, or simply ppc64el?
> > In "Supported hardware" Breno has "Power Systems" as arch name. ???
> > The ports page on https://www.debian.org/ports/ lists
> > https://wiki.debian.org/ppc64el/ as basic info page for the
> > ppc64el port, and there is no mention of "Power Systems"...
> > Also, in "Instructions for Netboot installation" under preparing
> > there is the term "PowerLinux machine".
> > This all should be harmonized to one term.
> [...]
>
> Based on
> <http://openpowerfoundation.org/technical/technical-resources/technical-specifications/>
> I think it's 'PowerPC 64-bit little-endian', or 'PowerISA little-endian'.
>
> However, comparing with the way we've named other architectures, '64-bit
> PowerPC (little-endian)' would be more consistent.
In the Jessie release announcement the name "AArch64" was introduced.
Would that be correct for the d-i manual too?
Or is it wrong at all?
Holger
--
============================================================
Created with Sylpheed 3.2.0 under
D E B I A N L I N U X 7 . 0 W H E E Z Y !
Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/
============================================================
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/20150426203634.ecd76dcb01a50bc21cad2...@wansing-online.de
