Control: severity -1 important Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org> (2015-02-04): > Control: found -1 20150107 > Control: severity -1 serious > > Hi, > > MARTON Jozsef wrote: > > The formatting dialog hanged at 33%. > > > > * What outcome did you expect instead? > > > > To re-format /dev/sda3 creating a fresh ext4 filesystem. > > > > > > After examining the situation and killing the mkfs.ext4 process on a > > second virtual terminal, the installer gave a red screen error and > > returned to the partitioning menu. > > > > Invoking mkfs.ext4 manually on the sencond VT, it gave the yes-no > > question that follows (captured under the running Jessie install, so > > mke2fs version might be different). This might be the point where > > the installer hanged at. > > > > # mkfs.ext4 /dev/sda3 > > mke2fs 1.42.12 (29-Aug-2014) > > /dev/sda3 contains a ext4 file system > > last mounted on / on Sat Nov 1 20:18:44 2014 > > Proceed anyway? (y,n) > > We ran into this today with the current Jessie installer (labeled RC1 > IIRC). Context was the reinstallation of a computer with the same > partition layout. > > The question vanishes if a -F is passed to the mkfs.ext* call, so this > should be an easy fix: > > -F Force mke2fs to create a filesystem, even if the > specified device is not a partition on a block special > device, or if other parameters do not make sense. In > order to force mke2fs to create a filesystem even if the > filesystem appears to be in use or is mounted (a truly > dangerous thing to do), this option must be specified twice. > > > After formatting from the second VT, installer was able to continue > > without re-formatting the partition. An other solution was to zero > > out the forst few megabytes of sda3 using dd and /dev/zero to allow > > formatting by the installer. > > I consider both variants unsuitable for unexperienced users. A hanging > TUI without _any_ trace of reason, neither in the TUI no in the syslog > nor in the partman log must not happen. > > Raising the severity to serious because I think that this is a > scenario (reinstallation or retrying an incomplete installation) which > can happen often enough and will confuse users massively due no > feedback from the installer what happens. > > (D-I team: feel free to downgrade again to important if you disagree, > but I really would like to see this fixed for Jessie.)
I don't think those usecases warrant to have this as a serious bug. That doesn't mean we shouldn't try and get this fixed (in wheezy and jessie). Any chance you could check and submit a patch? Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
