On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 08:51:52PM +0100, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > * Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> [141209 18:41]: > > Ralf Treinen <trei...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> (2014-12-09): > > > Source: ttf-cjk-compact > > > Version: 1.20 > > > Severity: serious > > > Tags: jessie > > > User: trei...@debian.org > > > Usertags: edos-uninstallable > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > ttf-cjk-compact build-depends on ruby1.8, which does not exist in jessie. > > > In fact, ruby1.8 was removed from testing on 2014-03-13. > > > > It really would be nice not to remove packages that are still > > build-depended on, especially when no bug reports are being filed. > > > > One month into the freeze isn't exactly the right time to attempt a 1.8 > > to 1.9 (or whatever else is current this week) ruby transition in d-i > > packages. > > AFAICT, ttf-cjk-compact 1.20 is not in jessie or sid. > ttf-cjk-compact 1.23 from jessie/sid depends on ruby, not ruby1.8.
In fact, the jessie Sources file contains both 1.20 and 1.23. Which means there is indeed no bug against ttf-cjk-compact. However, this seems still strange to me. I know that sid may contain temporarily multiple versions of the same package, but I don't think that this is OK for testing. Ralf. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141209201650.gb6...@seneca.home.org
