Thomas Goirand wrote: > > Does "OpenStack Proxy Node" have a clear meaning to openstack users? > > If the purpose is for it to be the node that controls the other nodes > > and has a management interface, that does not seem clear from that > > description. > > Then maybe rename it as "OpenStack controller node".
That sound better to me. > > Is openstack fully usable after installing these packages and answering > > any >= high priority debconf questions? > > Mostly. Networking wouldn't work out of the box for example. There's > some more work that should be done so that it gets easier, it's still > very complicated to deploy a fully working setup. If it's that hard to get it working, I wonder if it can be justified to put it in tasksel yet, where a casual user could stumble over it. I can think of a few reasons to include it: * To advertise that Debian is providing openstack packages. * Perhaps to aid deploying openstack. But if there's a long and complicated deployment process, eliminating an apt-get install from it, and using tasksel instead seems that it would not significantly improve it. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
