Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> (2014-08-10): > Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libgcrypt20.html > Control: tags -1 confirmed pending > > On 09/08/14 15:48, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > Hello, > > > > I would like to make sure that we only ship one gcrypt version in > > jessie and am therefore opening the transition tracker now. > > > > libgcrypt20 is mostly API compatible to libgcrypt11. The main reason > > why we have versioned -dev packages is that libgnutls26 is one of the > > packages which cannot work with the old API. libgnutls26 should not be > > shipped in jessie so I envision that it should be possible to make > > major parts of this transition by bin-NMUs since I will be able to > > make libgcrypt11-dev a dummy package depending on libgcrypt20-dev > > after libgnutls26 has been dropped. > > > > libgcrypt11's upstream support will end on 2016-12-31. > > > > I will do some test builds to find out more. > > > > Ben file: > > > > title = "libgcrypt20"; > > is_affected = .depends ~ "libgcrypt11" | .depends ~ "libgcrypt20" | > > .depends ~ "libgcrypt11-dev" | .depends ~ "libgcrypt20-dev" | .depends ~ > > "libgcrypt-dev"; > > is_good = .depends ~ "libgcrypt20"; > > is_bad = .depends ~ "libgcrypt11"; > > I have added a tracker for this (with minor tweaks). Let us know > when you have more information on this.
Hello people, please delay this until d-i beta 1 is out. I see we have at least this involved: | Package: libcryptsetup4-udeb | Source: cryptsetup | Depends: libc6-udeb (>= 2.18), libdevmapper1.02.1-udeb (>= 2:1.02.83), libgcrypt11-udeb (>= 1.5.0-0), libuuid1-udeb (>= 2.16) Not having more moving pieces before this release happens would be nice. Mraw, KiBi. [Cute bug bumber BTW. ;)]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
