Samuel Thibault, le Fri 11 Jul 2014 11:58:31 +0200, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault, le Fri 11 Jul 2014 11:04:02 +0200, a écrit : > > Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 07 Jul 2014 02:44:03 +0200, a écrit : > > > Right now we have a cronned edos/dose job that looks for uninstallable > > > udebs and let me know when situation changes (be it for better or for > > > worse); so at least the detection side is implemented already, > > > > Not completely: for now espeakup-udeb has an unversioned dependency on > > espeak-data-udeb. But that will probably be far easier and maintain than > > several udebs, I'll have a look. > > It does seem to work fine. I'll drop the libespeak-udeb package then.
We'll actually be able to check that the uninstallability test and binNMU of espeakup to fix it works fine, since I had added +dfsg suffix for the repackaging of the upstream espeak tarball. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140711102547.GN4837@type
