Package: flash-kernel
Version: 3.3+deb7u2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Built a custom kernel with make-kpkg
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
I built it in the directory containing the .git subdirectory
* What was the outcome of this action?
make-kpkg decided to call the kernel xxxx-kirkwood+-xxxx instead of
xxx-kirkwood-xxx, so flash-kernel considers it's no good for my system.
* What outcome did you expect instead?
flash-kernel should accept an image called xxx-kirkwood+ as valid for
a kirkwood system
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.4
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: armel (armv5tel)
Kernel: Linux 3.8.0-jh1-kirkwood
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages flash-kernel depends on:
ii devio 1.2-1+b1
ii initramfs-tools 0.109.1
ii linux-base 3.5
flash-kernel recommends no packages.
Versions of packages flash-kernel suggests:
ii u-boot-tools 2012.04.01-2
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/20140406155610.3317.136.report...@plug.colmar.atlantech.com
