On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 18:35 +0200, Joey Schulze wrote: > Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
[I don't appear to have Jonathan's mail - and nor do the list archives - so piggy-backing on Joey's.] > > We're much longer overdue for oldstable (February) than we are for stable > > (June); if we stagger them, should we consider oldstable first? It would quite probably be easier to do stable first, despite the above. We have a few packages in both p-u and o-p-u currently which are newer upstream versions (mostly via security), such that p-u > o-p-u > stable > oldstable. If the oldstable point release occurs first, we either have to not include those packages until 6.0.9 or temporarily have oldstable > stable, which is at best confusing. (We've been in the latter situation previously, for 5.0.9 / 6.0.3, and after some debate on the day decided to include the packages in any case; I'm not sure we should take that as precedent, however.) Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1378161699.18562.14.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
