On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:16:09AM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote: > Please don't. Let's talk Ralf into readding these things to > /proc/cpuinfo again. This is 2.4 - so supposed to be *stable*. I'm happy if > these things move to other locations for 2.5(maybe even adding proper > subarch(e.g. ip22), vendor(e.g. SGI), and model(Indigo2) fields to ease > up parsing), but *please* not for 2.4. I've not looked at 2.4.16 myself > yet but (re)moving this kind of information is not a good idea at this > point IMHO.
The breakage by the removal was quite surprisingly large, so I just commited a patch to add this information back to /proc/cpuinfo into CVS. Though I guess this should actually be informatin that should actually be returned by uname(2) ... Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
