On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 03:04:23PM +0200, Per Olofsson wrote: > This argument assumes that there are valid patents on H.264 held by the > MPEG-LA. According to <http://www.debian.org/legal/patent>, Debian will > not knowingly distribute software encumbered by patents. Since Debian is > distributing H.264 encoders and decoders, that must mean that we are not > aware of any patents. If you are aware of patents on H.264, then you > should probably discuss it with pate...@debian.org and not publicly. > > In any case, if you don't think Iceweasel should support H.264, then why > support H.264 through a Flash plugin in default installs? Why should > some software in Debian support H.264 but not Iceweasel's <video> tag? > Seems inconsistent to me.
Debian has H.264 support in anything in main? I can't think of anything. non-free sure, and deb-multimedia.org, but debian main? -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120627131134.gj32...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
