On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:42, Joey Hess <jo...@debian.org> wrote: > Looking at the lack of any explanation attached to #659208, > I am very tempted to revert it. CCing Otavio since he seemed to find > some value in that bug that I don't see.
Agreed in reverting it for now. > Also, why was #659208 not closed when it was applied? Why was its added > file not fixed to use the same indentation as the rest of os-prober? > This seems badly handled all around. I didn't close it because not the full patch has been applied; The patch needs to be reworked to work with awk and also follow the indenting code rules of os-prober (my fault in not catching it). Once it is done we can apply it again. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkp6etmr3j-m3yv26itgktm1ce6hsnv5it3wthwu+e7...@mail.gmail.com
