Hi, Am Donnerstag 15 Dezember 2011, 22:13:43 schrieb Stefan Lippers-Hollmann: > Hi > > On Thursday 15 December 2011, Joey Hess wrote: > > Heiko Stübner wrote: > > > So the question would be on how to proceed to get this into unstable > > > without breaking to much. > > [...] > > I have prepared and tested (for the non-udeb cases, see below) iw[1] and > wpasupplicant[2] in svn now, likewise hostapd[3] will switch to > libnl-3 >= 3.2 (from libnl1) after it gets available in unstable (no > urgency at all). > > Something seems to be missing for the udeb handling though: > Package: wpasupplicant-udeb > [...] > Depends: libc6-udeb (>= 2.13), libcrypto1.0.0-udeb (>= 1.0.0), > libnl-3-200-udeb (>= 3.2.3), libnl-genl-3-200, busybox-udeb > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I'm not overly familiar with udeb specifics, but I think > this is > missing something equivalent to > DEB_DH_MAKESHLIBS_ARGS_libnl-3-200 := -V"libnl-3-200 (>= > $(DEB_UPSTREAM_VERSION))" --add-udeb=$(udeb) in libnl3's debian/rules. my understanding of udeb handling is also only rudimentary :-)
As I did not split the udeb libnl-genl-3 resides at the moment in libnl-3-200- udeb. The dependencies all have a "-udeb" in its package name, but libnl- genl-3-200 has not. So my guess would be, that a libnl-genl-3-200-udeb is also necessary. > For iw (which is needed by crda's udev rules), it would be nice to > have libnl.so.3 and libnl-genl.so.3 in /lib/ (#622247: iw binary should > be installed in /sbin). The wpasupplicant package would also profit > from that (#537790), although it is haunted by openssl and zlib as > dependencies well. As libnl seems to be used by a lot of system-level programs, should only these two libs move to /lib or all? Heiko -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201112182016.09233.he...@sntech.de
