Any comments? In particular, note this introduces a build dependency on kernel-image udeb for kfreebsd-9, which hasn't reached testing yet.
AFAICT this shouldn't be a problem because daily builds use unstable, but I'd like to make sure this aspect is fine before I commit this. Thanks 2011/11/22 Robert Millan <r...@debian.org>: > Hi, > > Now that kFreeBSD 9.0 finally works in D-I (many thanks to Michael > Tokarev who polished the missing bits in busybox), I think it would be > a good time to begin wider testing of kFreeBSD 9.0 in D-I environment. > I've done some quick tests and it basically works, but it surely > needs more exposure before it's in releasable state. > > I propose enabling build of kfreebsd-9 images alongside standard 8.2 > ones, similarly how it's been done with Linux before (e.g. 2.4 vs 2.6 > in sarge), with addition of netboot-9, monolithic-9, etc targets. > > See attached patch. > > -- > Robert Millan > -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXMD8CodmM0+BKqOy6zQadKe_VZP8nb=mtg6cemsjb1...@mail.gmail.com
