On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 01:33, Steve McIntyre <st...@einval.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 12:49:17AM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: >>>>I'm not objecting to the fact that "mini" uses an older kernel; but >>>>I object rather strongly to this being completely undocumented. >> >>> Which mini image? A URL would be handy, as I'm not sure what you might >>> be using. >> >>http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/mini.iso > > Hmmm, OK. That's using a d-i and kernel build from *squeeze*, not > sarge as you said to start with, I'm guessing a simple mistake on your > part when typing that! :-) > > It's also a mini netboot image which is the domain of the debian-boot > team. Forwarding there for comment...
There's no release of installer yet, since squeeze, thus this still points to the current installer. We plan to get one running soon. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkpg60potofdd+iz72hzvtq3qmbfh833mpqkwx9r9db...@mail.gmail.com
