I'm just sitting at the annual Samba conference, listening to B. Kuhn's talk about GPL enforcement and v2/v3 issues (samba is known to be the first major project to move to GPLv3).
So, well, just a random idea: would it be such a weird idea to try moving the licence for various D-I components to either GPLv3 or "v2+" (v2 and above)? What would be the stance of those of us who contributed code in various D-I packages? Mine is actually: I'm perfectly OK with moving the licence of all components I contributed code to, to GPLv3. Not sure if that's enough as I'm not that a licence freak and I'm mostly ignorant of these things. --
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
