Hi After modifying /etc/default/grub and updating grub, I restarted the machine, and... it booted up without problem. Kill me now! I must have made mistakes in tweaking boot menu.
I feel very sorry to have troubled you and taken your time. Obrigado. On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:36:30 +0900 水原 文 <mizuh...@acm.org> wrote: > Hi > > I have used rootdelay=9, as described in the release-notes. > Frankly, I am not familiar with grub2, and as I specified it from the > grub boot menu, there is a slight chance that I made some mistakes. > > I did some research and found that I can wirte > GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="rootdelay=9" > in the file /etc/default/grub. > I will try with this setting and larger values later. > > On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:21:45 +0100 > Miguel Figueiredo <el...@debianpt.org> wrote: > > > A Sabado 26 Marco 2011 09:11:03 MIZUHARA Bun voce escreveu: > > > Package: installation-reports > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > It seems that I am having the same problem as Herbert had. > > > Specifying "rootdelay" did not help, but after countless installation > > > retries, > > > I managed to figure out a recovery process from the shell prompt on > > > initramfs. > > > > > > (initramfs) sh scripts/local-top/mdadm > > > ... messages from mdadm ... > > > (initramfs) sh scripts/local-top/lvm2 > > > ... messages from lvm ... > > > (initramfs) exit > > > > > > These commands bring the machine back into normal boot sequence. > > > I suspect the problem lies in the module insertion order. > > > > [...] > > > > What values of rootdelay have you used? > > > > -- > > Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, > > > > Miguel Figueiredo > > http://www.DebianPT.org > > -- > 水原 文 <mizuh...@acm.org> > -- 水原 文 <mizuh...@acm.org> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110328193017.733c.57f81...@acm.org
