found 615926 1:1.17.1-8 notfound 615926 1:1.17.1-10 thanks On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 12:17:18 -0400 Joey Hess wrote:
> Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > On Tue, March 1, 2011 05:21, Michael Gilbert wrote: > > > package: busybox-udeb > > > version: 1:1.17.1-10 > > > severity: grave > > > > > > Hi, testing is currently uninstallable since debootstrap (as of 1.0.28) > > > no longer uses md5 for integrity checks. It can make use of various > > > shaXYZsum instead. I think providing sha1sum should be sufficient, but > > > it may make sense to provide more than that. > > > > The version you quote (which is not yet in testing) provides sha256sum. Is > > that not sufficient then? > > Downgrading this bug as it'll be preventing the fix from reaching > testing. > > If this version of busybox-udeb actually does not work, I second Thijs's > request for details. I was busy working on other things and blindly accepted the version number from my unstable box where I generated the bug report, not the actual vm where I ran into the issue. Having sha256sum available may be enough, but I haven't looked at that. > Note that base-installer 1.116 is also needed, and also not yet in > testing. Really, it's fairly pointless to be using wheezy_d-i CD images > at this point in the development cycle. Perhaps the fix for this is > just to point the CD symlinks at the sid_d-i images. I'm generating nightly testing snapshots, and those are incapable of completing an installation right now due to this issue, which is why I submitted this. This may be a bit premature, but my monthly snapshots may be a better resource to direct users to that want a reliable testing installer. Well, at least that's the goal anyway ;) Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110301193316.85384796.michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com
