Hilmar Preusse <hill...@web.de> writes: > On 25.02.11 Ferenc Wagner (wf...@niif.hu) wrote: > >> Hilmar Preusse <hill...@web.de> writes: >> >>> During the upgrade of lvm by calling "apt-get dist-upgrade" >>> everything has been fixed, but until then these file systems were >>> unavailable. >> >> Strange, LVM should scan all available block devices for PVs, unless >> forbidden by manual filter rules. > > I'm pretty sure there are none. I can provide the lvm config before > and after the upgrade if this is helpful.
Only if you got a conffile conflict during the LVM upgrade. Otherwise you must be using the default filter, which allows hda and sda alike. >> I wonder why it didn't happen in your case... Wasn't this a >> problem with missing /dev/mapper/* nodes instead? > > However right after the first reboot all view commands (vgdisplay, > pvdisplay etc.) complained that some PVs having specific UUIDS could > not be accessed/listed(?). This suggests that *some* PVs must have been available, as the VG was recognized. Is it possible that after the first reboot you somehow temporarily lost some PVs (but not all)? -- Regards, Feri. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87r5audgwe....@tac.ki.iif.hu
