Anton Zinoviev, le Mon 15 Nov 2010 18:38:53 +0200, a écrit : > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 03:22:23PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Well, that question was never asked before for console-data, even for > > non-latin keymaps. But it's probably one of the very few candidates to > > keep, indeed. > > For the Cyrillic languages it was asked by console-cyrillic. And for > the other non-Latin languages, well, they simply didn't have good > support before console-setup.
Ok, that makes sense. I'll add it back then. > > > For Bulgarian it is imperative to add 'bg(phonetic)'. > > > > Ah? The console-data to xkb translation code was using just us,bg, > > This code was irrelevant, again because of console-cyrillic. Most of > the people are using the other layout and both layouts are as different > one from another as qwerty and dvorak (people using one of them are > unable to use the other). So we need to propose both? (that's fine) > > > 2. the same can happen in the udeb if the user uses preseeding. > > > > I don't understant this. > > People will be unable to preseed values that are not supported by the > short list. But I agree, if this question is used only by the udeb and > not by the main package, then it is only a wishlist to support > non-standard layouts. Yes, that's expected. Actually, we probably want to prune the non-d-i-supported xkb layouts to save room. Apart from these, is the patch roughly OK? (I'll submit it again for your approval before commiting anyway) Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101115164924.gd11...@const.bordeaux.inria.fr
