On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 11:57:57AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: >On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 11:19:25AM -0400, wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 03:27:50PM +0200, J.A. Bezemer wrote: >> > Next week, Debian will have a booth at a smallish technical FOSS >> > conference (http://www.t-dose.org/). I'll try to burn some DVDs to hand >> > out. But I'd prefer to burn some "squeeze preview" rather than the lenny >> > stuff we already handed out last year. >> > >> > So the question is: is the current weekly-build multi-arch DVD >> > (i386-amd64-source, 25 Oct version) anything good to hand out at the >> > booth? Did anyone ever try if it installs properly on i386 and amd64? >> > Would you recommend it to show off Debian to nit-picking >> > technically-oriented people? >> > >> > Opinions/comments very welcomed! >> >> I tried the multiarch iso a couple of times in the last 2 weeks and it >> only works on powerpc. i386 and amd64 are missing all the kernel module >> udeb's and the installer is hence completely useless for those. >> >> The single architecture iso's for netinst were fine however. >> >> I just checked the Oct 29 multiarch netinst image and it is still broken. >> >> No one ever acknowleged my email reporting the problem to the debian-boot >> list so I have no idea if anyone knows or cares unfortunately. > >Nevermind. The Beta1 DVD i386/amd64 multiarch is fine. It is the >netinst i386/amd64/powerpc multiarch CD image that is broken.
Hmmm. I've not seen your report, but I only tend to skim the -boot list. Are you using the squeeze or sid version? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com Welcome my son, welcome to the machine. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101101161917.gf27...@einval.com
