Quoting Nelson A. de Oliveira (nao...@debian.org): > I know that they are different distros, with different priorities, objectives, > etc, but it's just to show that maybe 300% the size of RAM is too much for > contemporaneous machines.
I tend to agree with this. Anyone objecting to the following patch?
Index: home
===================================================================
--- home (révision 64912)
+++ home (copie de travail)
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
filesystem{ ext2 }
mountpoint{ /boot } .
-500 4000 7000 $default_filesystem
+500 4000 10000 $default_filesystem
$lvmok{ }
$bootable{ }
method{ format }
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
$default_filesystem{ }
mountpoint{ / } .
-96 512 300% linux-swap
+96 512 200% linux-swap
$lvmok{ }
method{ swap }
format{ } .
Index: multi
===================================================================
--- multi (révision 64912)
+++ multi (copie de travail)
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
$default_filesystem{ }
mountpoint{ / } .
-500 3000 6000 $default_filesystem
+500 3000 9000 $default_filesystem
$lvmok{ }
method{ format }
format{ }
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
$default_filesystem{ }
mountpoint{ /var } .
-96 512 300% linux-swap
+96 512 200% linux-swap
$lvmok{ }
method{ swap }
format{ } .
Index: atomic
===================================================================
--- atomic (révision 64912)
+++ atomic (copie de travail)
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
$default_filesystem{ }
mountpoint{ / } .
-96 512 300% linux-swap
+96 512 200% linux-swap
$lvmok{ }
method{ swap }
format{ } .
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
