Unfortunatly, popcon data can't be used to help with these kinds of decisions. It produces graphs like these, which probably only show that abiword and OOo have desktop file and icons that are read when gnome is used.
http://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=abiword+abiword-common+openoffice.org+epiphany-browser++openoffice.org-writer&show_vote=on&want_legend=on&want_ticks=on&from_date=&to_date=&hlght_date=&date_fmt=%25Y-%25m&beenhere=1 However: http://www.linuxjournal.com/magazine/readers-choice-awards-2009?page=0,1 85% of users surveyed preferred OOs; 3% preferred Abiword. Joss: Doesn't openoffice.org-gnome provide gnome VFS integration? Nautilus seems to use OOo by default to open .doc files, with Abiword offered as an option in the context menu. It's not clear to me how that level of integration is "a joke". The single bug open on oo.o-gnome is #341965, "Fonts not perfectly aligned with gnome". -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
