Hi,
Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org> wrote:
> Well, to keep the manual readable we should probably not replace Debian
> with &debian; as it is now. Maybe rename the existing `debian' entity
> into something else like debiangnu, and then introduce &debian;
> expanding to Debian?
Yes, I would recommend this solution.
Holger
--
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Created with Sylpheed 2.5.0
under DEBIAN GNU/LINUX 5.0.0 - L e n n y
Registered LinuxUser #311290 - http://counter.li.org/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100919205528.276d84af.li...@wansing-online.de
