* Thibaut GIRKA <t...@sitedethib.com> [2010-08-16 16:15]: > -XB-Subarchitecture: iop32x ixp4xx kirkwood orion5x > +XB-Subarchitecture: iop32x ixp4xx kirkwood orion5x s3c24xx
Is s3c24xx what was decided in the end? I remember there was a lot of discussion of s3c vs s3c24xx but I cannot remember the outcome. > + "GTA02") > + return 1 Is this really what this device will be called in the mainline kernel? IMHO it would make more sense to use a more descriptive name, but if GTA02 has been decided already that's obviously fine. > + "GTA02") > + in-target update-initramfs -u || true > + if ! apt-install uboot-mkimage; then > + error "apt-install uboot-mkimage failed" > + fi > + if ! apt-install uboot-envtools; then > + error "apt-install uboot-envtools failed" > + fi Ok. > + # Modify u-boot environment > + rootfs=$(findfs /) > + bootfs=$(findfs /boot) > + modify_uboot_env $rootfs $bootfs > + ;; I suggest you move this patch out to the patch in #586221. This way, the current patch can be applied even without the fix for #586221. > + check_subarch "s3c24xx" > + tmp="$(tempfile)" > + printf "Generating u-boot image..." >&2 > + gzip -9 -c "$kfile" > "$tmp" Why do you need to compress the kernel? It should be a zImage or LZMA-image already anywhere. > + mkimage -A arm -O linux -T multi -C gzip -a 0x30008000 \ > + -e 0x30008000 -n "$desc" -d "$tmp":"$ifile" > "$tmp.uboot" >&2 1>/dev/null > + echo "done." >&2 Will this actually boot on any Freerunner machines without the -p option you proposed in #584166? -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100831212918.gw3...@jirafa.cyrius.com
