Hi, On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:54:53PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Miguel Figueiredo, le Tue 24 Aug 2010 11:02:15 +0100, a écrit : > > On 24-08-2010 01:18, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > >+Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is a Debian GNU system that replaces the Linux > > >+kernel with the kFreeBSD kernel. This port of Debian is currently > > >+only being developed for the i386 and amd64 architectures, although > > >+ports to other architectures is possible. > > > > +Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is a Debian GNU system with the kFreeBSD kernel. > > > > Removed "replaces Linux kernel". > > Why removing it? I feel it's quite important to underline that Debian > GNU/kFreeBSD is not a Linux distribution, to reduce the number of users > installing it by error and wondering why a lot of tutorials don't work > with their installation.
I think both have good points. Definition of "Debian GNU/kFreeBSD" does not need to be destructed by excuse of not-being-Linux. But the waring for non-Linux should remain. What about text along: | Debian GNU/&arch-kernel; is a Debian GNU system with the &arch-kernel; kernel. | | This port of Debian is currently only being developed for the i386 and | amd64 architectures, although ports to other architectures is possible. | | Please note that Debian GNU/&arch-kernel; is not a Linux system thus some | information on Linux system may not apply to it. Of course the second and last should be arch specific. HURD may be able to share some text, too :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100824153923.ga3...@debian.org
