Please keep debian-boot in the loop at least as long this is alos about d-i.
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:45:14PM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > > Then we need a kernel configuration for the s3c24xx architecture and a > > > patch to enable an image for this architecture for linux-2.6. The kernel > > > configuration should be as similar as possible to the configurations of > > > the other kernel images (especially the other arm images). This is where > > > I stopped by the end of last year because of lack of time. If you want > > > to continue this work I can provide you with a partially working patch > > > for linux-2.6. > > > > Can't we use, for a start, linux-2.6-openmoko as it is? For a start probably. But if we go this route I fear that it will stay this way and there won't be any official images for the Freerunner for a long time. Frans opinion seems to be that it's possible to commit changes to d-i even if we use an external kernel. At Debconf9 I got the impression that this is not what the d-i team wants. > > > > I was planning to use the kernel package in pkg-fso, at least at the > > beginning, because I don't know the main differences yet. > > I'm interested in having a clean kernel package, however, I have no > > experience in kernel hacking. > > You should definitely contact luca. He was the one creating the > first pkg-fso kernel package and he is the one working on a Debian > main package afair. For the Debian main kernel package I believe > most drivers could be done with module-assitant. The mainline kernel > should provide CPU and audio support at least. As far as I know > there is still no support for the display and touchscreen stuff, > which is probably the crunchpoint. Apart from this the vibrator didn't > work when I compiled the driver as module instead of compiling support > into the kernel. We don't need display support for d-i if we use the network-console based d-i. We only need the part of the glamo necessary to access the SD card. Gaudenz
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature