On Sat Oct 20, 2001 at 01:40:42PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Have you guys thought about moving to busybox /bin/sh rather than ash? > > Or do you do that already? Or something else? > > It wasn't quite a posix shell last time I checked. That was a while ago > though.
busybox has a version of ash in it now. We have made a number of changes and add features like full command line editing, and tab completion, while still making it a fair bit smaller then the current ash package. There may be a few more things needed, but I'm already using it for several projects and it is working just great for me... -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/ --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
