On Friday 19 March 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I'm not sure whether it's feasible to push everything up to the
> “libvte9-udeb, libgtk2.0-0-udeb, libpango1.0-udeb, gtk2-engines-udeb”
> layer, that would break cdebconf-gtk-{entropy,terminal,udeb}?That's not a problem as those udebs are currently unused in testing. It simply means that people will not yet be able to build G-I images from testing, but that is not a problem. It is infinitely more important not to break the existing alpha1 release. > If that sounds fine, just asking release folks to force the new > packages in would do? IMO breaking some dependencies for packages that are unused anyway is preferable to the risk of breaking alpha1. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201003191337.38751.elen...@planet.nl
