Rob Bos wrote: > > - /dev is 3k bigger > > How practical would it be to compile devfs and include devfsd in the > bootfloppies?
If it wasn't for that 33k binary plus config files, I'd say go for it, but we can't afford to bloat more right now. > on my system, devfsd is 33k, 15k after gzip. This would let b-f get rid of > /dev/*, and could make for more reliable installation scripts (i.e, once > you've inserted the module you can forget about whether there's a dev entry). That is a good point indeed. > I'm not sure if bootfloppies is using a 2.4 kernel, though. Probably not, > considering the massive increase in size between 2.2 and 2.4. d-i is ignoring 2.2 -- 2.4 all the way. -- see shy jo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
