On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Frans Pop <elen...@planet.nl> wrote: > On Tuesday 09 February 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Frans Pop <elen...@planet.nl> wrote: >> > The best alternative is to try to convince the s390 buildd admin to >> > allow rootskel-gtk to build for s390 (good luck with that). Limiting >> > the arches for cdebconf-gtk would be a bad solution as it goes against >> > general packaging conventions: we don't limit packages to arches >> > unless there's a technical reason to do so, not just because it's not >> > used. >> >> I agree with this point of view. This looks to be the most logical >> solution for it. > > Also note that if we do switch to X.Org I want to try to get the graphical > installer working on my Sparc Ultra 10 again. And I'm also getting an > arm-based netbook soon for which I'd like to try it. > > So not having cdebconf-gtk in the archive for those arches would be > inconvenient.
Yes; I thought about it after you said about "technical reason" above. To avoid problems in next migration I'm making the depends [!s390] but I want to try to get rootskel-gtk built in s390 since it has no technical reason to not do that. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
