On Sunday 13 December 2009, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > My only comment was that the diffs would have been easier to review > without so many whitespace changes. :-)
Yes. As explained in my initial mail, that was a deliberate choice to decrease the risk of errors by removing them and to make comparing the (old)stable versions with the current version for Squeeze easier. Both these advantages resulted in a much smaller change of accidental breakage in the backports of the patches. > Accepted for both stable and oldstable (already built everywhere for Thanks. > stable, oldstable is waiting for ftpmaster to process p-u-new again). Any chance of that happening soon? Cheers, FJP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
