On Tuesday 24 November 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote: > From project POV g-i is not a blocker and it could allow some "bad > press" against GTK+ not bothering to support DFB backend. I'm not > against this option if other people support it as well.
This could be done if the gtk issue cannot be solved within a reasonable time, but IMO *only* if all -gtk targets are disabled. We should not release known broken images. CD builds should handle absence of G-I images correctly, but it would be good to verify that. Cheers, FJP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
