On Saturday 21 November 2009, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Do you know if there's a good reason > against moving apt-setup's generators/60local to > /usr/lib/post-base-installer.d (well, maybe copying rather than moving > since apt-setup regenerates sources.list)?
Correct, it would have to be copied-and-modified-as-needed as apt-setup starts from scratch. I don't think we should promote the use of unofficial repositories during base system installation, but if you want to create a custom Lenny image for arm with a newer kernel that uses an unofficial repo to get a kernel, then there's no reason not to do that. Essentially you can do whatever you like. It may be good to formalize the added hacks in something like a lenny-arm-support udeb so that users can verify what happens, but that's up to you. I've seen no initiatives to produce official lenny-and-a-half kernels or installation images, so if you want to do something you'll probably have to do it yourself. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
