Aurelien Jarno a écrit : > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 01:56:37PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 06:00:30PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >>> Robert Millan a écrit : >>>> If you plan on making this the official installer, I would strongly >>>> advice against replacing the old installer completely untill "netinst" >>>> images are provided. With "netboot" or "bussinesscard" builds, install >>>> process can break due to external changes in the archive, which seems >>>> highly undesireable. >>>> >>>> OTOH netinst is self-contained, and can even install without a network >>>> connection. >>> That's indeed something wanted, but I don't know how to produce such >>> images which already include a set of packages. If someone can help on >>> that, that would be appreciated. >> Btw, now that it is possible to install from testing/squeeze, and the >> likelyhood that this install path breaks is small, perhaps this is less >> of an issue. >> >> May I suggest making testing/squeeze installs the default, so that the old >> builds can finally be deprecated? >> > > Looks a good idea. I'll try to install a testing system and if there is > no serious regression compared to unstable, I'll make that the default. >
I have just given a try, and during the installation, there is an error message about security.debian.org not having support for kfreebsd. The installation continues anyway, but it may confuse our users. Any opinion on that? -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
