Re: busybox still too bloated

[Erik Andersen]

On Tue Sep 25, 2001 at 03:03:48PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:04:28PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> 
> > Also, what about busybox ash?  Is that mature enough to use instead of
> > the proper ash package?  Or did it have some problems?
> 
> it ignores posix.

posix also requires command line editing.  Are you volunteering
to index all the posix ignoring features?  I'd love to have bug
reports on them all,

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen   email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED], formerly of Lineo
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--

PGP signature