* Gaudenz Steinlin <gaud...@debian.org> [2009-07-29 17:45]: > The most important thing is that we can all agree on the same name. > Which one we actually choose does not matter that much for me. I would prefer > s3c24xx, though, as I've mostly settled for this name now for the things > I've done in during the last days. Is there any opposition against this > name?
It's fine with me. I don't think it makes a big difference whether it's s3c24xx or s3c... just pick one and stick to it. :) > > I think it's fine to apply patches for e.g. libdebian-installer, > > base-installer, flash-kernel, etc; but you obviously cannot change > > linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6 and the d-i build system before we have a > > kernel in the archive. > > Is there no way we can commit the patches to the build system but not > activate it for Debian builds? Yeah, you can do that. Anyway, please post your new patches to the list for review first. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
