On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 08:41:53PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > Also, I think for low-volume projects such as debootstrap, it is faster to > > just fix up the whitespaces while commiting and tell the contributor > > to take a close look at whitespace issues before sending the next patch.
> Well I somewhat agree with that. I've reported it to you so you could > look at it and fix it but in case you did not found the time for that > I'd do that. > BTW the thing I had noticed you got fixed. So you are happy with the whitespace now? > @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ > > if doing_variant fakechroot; then > setup_devices_fakechroot > + elif doing_variant schratchbox; then > + true > Typo? :-) Hrmh. In fact this shows that that codepath is actually not needed then :) Thanks for spotting it. We still need the /proc path since we can't mount in scratchbox. updated patch attached. > I'll wait few days for comments from others before commit it. thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
