On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Jérémy Bobbio <lu...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 03:34:59PM +0900, Glenn Saberton wrote: >> Here's the patchset again against current netcfg. I haven't actually added >> anything to the patchset since the last time I submitted it for >> consideration. >> I intend on also using wpasupplicant for setting the wep key which in my eyes >> simplifies things by removing the current wep function. We can also use it >> for >> setting the essid for an open ap which would hopefully work around the issue >> outlined below. > > Actually, the more I think of it, the more I think it would be the > best way to go. And I think such change should be made quite early in > the release cycle…
I fully agree with that; this would allow us to properly handle any possible regression during the cycle and also cleanup netcfg code a bit. Glenn has show interest to use wpasupplicant to also handle WEP assignment and this also makes sense for me since it simplify the final code and testing paths. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
