On Monday 06 April 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote: > It would be nice if you could clarify why do you believe it is > nonsense.
No thanks. I see no reason why _I_ should make that effort. As you seem to think that a change is needed and would improve things, it would be nice if you could explain, in some detail, what is currently lacking and how extra uploads would improve things. And it would be extra nice if you could show in that explanation that you actually understand (or at least have tried to understand) how the current setup works. > As you can see on the meeting minutes nobody has objected to it... I think that's primarily because nobody had an opinion on it as so far nobody has ever shown any real and sustained interest in helping out with the manual [1]. So TBH I'm not very impressed by that argument. As soon as someone steps up and actually commits to helping out with maintenance of and RM for the manual (which is a fairly serious amount of work BTW), I'll be happy to explain how and why I do things as I currently do them [2]. Cheers, FJP [1] Yes, faw does the daily builds, but the original intention was that he'd take over RM, which never happened (which is fine). And yes, Colin is very good at providing/committing patches when he makes functional changes in D-I, but that's not the same as what we're talking about here. [2] Just as I did, in great detail, when faw took over the daily builds. See mailing list archives. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
