Ian Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I belive we should use a xen image flavor for it (as suggested >> previously by Frans IIRC). If you could do that it would be nice. > > One of the principles of the paravirt_ops kernel stuff is that there > should be no need for a distro to special case a particular > virtualisation solution in kernel builds or elsewhere. Any image built > with these patches will also work fine on native and could be made to > work on kvm/virtio etc assuming an interested party was available. > That's why I'm keen to have a non-Xen specific image. If consensus is > against me then I'll change my mind, clearly ;-) <...> > Final patch is the the installer itself to cause a 686-bigmem netboot > image to be built. [installer.patch] <...>
Right. You basically did what we want. You've added a netboot image using the 686-bigmem kernel images. This is what I was calling the xen-image. It is useful since we don't need to bload normal users with that. I'll look into the patches and comment... later today or so. -- O T A V I O S A L V A D O R --------------------------------------------- E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br --------------------------------------------- "Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]