tag 488424 pending thanks On Tuesday 01 July 2008, Joey Hess wrote: > Frans Pop wrote: > > What about something like the attached (untested) patch? > > > > It ensures that both the Release and Release.gpg files are always > > downloaded. > > That's perfectly reasonable. I think it's ok to not cache these even if > they are good, because it prevents running debootstrap later with an > out of date Release file
OK. Tested and committed. I had to make an additional change as the "nocache" option was being used as md5sum, which obviously won't work :-P While testing I also noticed that if all variants (.gz, .bz2) of a Packages file fail to verify because their md5sums don't match what's listed in the Release file, debootstrap did not abort. It would fail later on, but with a rather vague error. I also added a test for that (re-using an existing error code). Cheers, FJP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
