On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 01:52:34PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > MaX in the FaX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > >the guy who builds the > > > reiser version doesn't provide that? Why not? > > > > .... I think because the goal, is to have only a floppy disk set, not a > > bootable cdrom. The problem is that the email address of the guy that > > has provided this set, is not avaible, so i cannot communicate directly > > whit them. [EMAIL PROTECTED] there are no CDROM images because i don't have a cdrom burner, so i have no way to test such an image. > > Do you know a hacked version of boot-floppies.xx.deb with support of > > reiserfs, during the install phase? if exist, where? > > No, sorry. http://chao.ucsd.edu/debian/boot-floppies/ > > If possible for 2.2.19 kernel version. > > Yes, I understand the boot-floppies could easily be changed to support > this in the mainstream. > > Does anyone know of any issues which would block our providing a > "resierfs" version? 1) reiserfs flavored kernel or 2) reiserfs patched kernel somehwere. if we used 2.4.x kernels which have the reiserfs ``patches'' already integrated, this would negate both of those. in the current CVS for woody, there is support for reiserfs. however, the resierfs eabled code looks to see if flavor=reiserfs is passes as a boot argument. this can be readily changed, if we somehow make another flavor with reiserfs patches already integrated. -john -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
