On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:00:17PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > we aren't even responsible for base (debootstrap is). Problems with > > > base should be filed against debootstrap; > > > > Should the maintainer for the "base" pseudo-package be chaned to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] now? > > Yes, indeedy... how do we get that changed? Or are you volunteering > to do that? I can't do it, but an FTP admin can -- I suggest you file a bug on ftp.debian.org pseudo-package asking for this change to be done. -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and powe... Bas Zoetekouw
- Re: i386 flavors rearrange? Nils Rennebarth
- Re: i386 flavors rearrange? Herbert Xu
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and powe... Stephen R Marenka
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and powe... Ethan Benson
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and... Anthony Towns
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and powe... Jeff Sheinberg
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and powe... Chris Tillman
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and powe... Josip Rodin
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and... Adam Di Carlo
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and powe... David Whedon
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and powe... Ethan Benson
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and powe... Tollef Fog Heen
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and powe... Erik Andersen