Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Oh, thats right. > I wonder if I should trim out some of the fat in the .deb then. > For example, the .deb contains the busybox shell (lash), which > is not being used... I expect a bit of hunting could find a > fw others. Fat trimming sounds worthwhile to me... I'd hate to make the .deb less useful generally -- but I would love the space savings... -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onshored.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
