On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:16:49PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > we aren't even responsible for base (debootstrap is). Problems with base > should be filed against debootstrap; Should the maintainer for the "base" pseudo-package be chaned to [EMAIL PROTECTED] now? -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and powerpc ... Adam Di Carlo
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and... Josip Rodin
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and... Adam Di Carlo
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and... Bas Zoetekouw
- Re: i386 flavors rearrange? Nils Rennebarth
- Re: i386 flavors rearrange? Herbert Xu
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and... Stephen R Marenka
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386... Ethan Benson
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and... Ethan Benson
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386... Anthony Towns
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and... Jeff Sheinberg
- Re: boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386... Ethan Benson