Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 11:24:57AM -0400 wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > include /usr/lib/debootstrap/scripts/sid
> >
> > At the moment it is a symlink to woody, and the way we build the root disk
> > doesn't preserve symlinks, so we are wasting a few k with two copies of the
> > same file, just different names. I am assuming that at some point in the
> > future (once we freeze and sid has started to diverge from woody in more
> > important ways) these two scripts will be different. With that in mind this
> > isn't the ideal solution today (wasted space b/c symlinks don't copy) but it is
> > the long best term solution.
>
> Why aren't we using the '/usr/lib/debootstrap/scripts/sid' which come
> with debootstrap?
we are, it's a symlink to woody, but the b-f buld system turns it into a regular
(identical file).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
