Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I may have committed a fix for the same bug today. Please check.
>
> Indeed you did, and it's a similar fix. This is what I originally
> did:
>
> @@ -206,18 +206,11 @@
> - for (; (k = mbrtowc (&wc, s, n, &term->ps)) >= 0; s += k, n -= k)
> + for (; n > 0 && (k = mbrtowc (&wc, s, n, &term->ps)) >= 0; s += k, n -= k)
>
> Your patch seems rather more complete; should I use that instead?
Yes, I think so.
> > BTW: now that we use glibc's UTF8 support, what locale should
> > we use? I've found en_IN.UTF-8 (in my /etc/locale.gen) to work,
> > but I don't even know what that means.
>
> Indian, I think...
I have asked before, but never received a satisfactory answer, what
you should do if you want a "standard" UTF-8 locale. Probably there
should be something like "C.UTF-8".
Edmund
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
