On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 04:28:37PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > You are assuming that talkd have buffer overflows, but you have no > proof of it. Of course a reasonably paranoid person would assume that buffer overflows exist and mitigate the risk as appropriate. Unless you can *prove* that the software is secure (proof by assertion or proof by "it hasn't happened yet" aren't) an assumption of security is unwarranted. -- Mike Stone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: woody release task needs help: package priorities Simon Richter
- Re: woody release task needs help: package priorities Marco d'Itri
- Re: woody release task needs help: package priorities Sam Hartman
- Re: woody release task needs help: package priorities Rob Browning
- Re: woody release task needs help: package priorities Anthony Towns
- Re: woody release task needs help: package priorities Vince Mulhollon
- Re: woody release task needs help: package prioritie... Tollef Fog Heen
- Re: woody release task needs help: package prior... Michael Stone
- Re: woody release task needs help: package prior... Wichert Akkerman
- Re: woody release task needs help: package priorities Vince Mulhollon